On April 24, 2024 at 2:57 pm, Chris Davies wrote:
Mark,
I hope you are well.
After yesterday, we really need to reinstate Brit Wanker Copper of the week. Alternatively, we could just give it to Sir Mark Rowley every week.
Not only was Tommy Robinson's case tossed after his dispersal order was not properly served, the bail conditions were unlawful and all the body cam footage mysteriously disappeared but the site of the St George's flag in London was the red rag to the Met's bull.
No such problem with the Palestinian "protests" naturally, where the red rag is replaced with red carpet.
Just the £60,000 in legal fees for Tommy to achieve justice. Better than $1M in punitive damages I suppose.
18 months in post and Mark Rowley has presided over the impossible. He is a worse Met Police Commissioner than Cressida Dick. That is some achievement.
Your demographic predictions are coming true.
Two tier policing is now an absolute reality in the UK's capital city and as we head below 1 in 3 of London's population being White British, how long until Islam controls all of the top jobs that impact the freedoms of expression and association of the populace?
Keep well Mark.
On April 24, 2024 at 2:59 pm, Hart wrote:
Mark....What do you think is the reason for the inordinate number of females represented at these pro-Gaza/anti-Israel university protests? And, not only at the universities. In recent videos of anti-Israel street protests in France, the vast majority of protesters were female. Not that I doubt the demented sincerity of these women, but is this a clever tactic of the protests' organizers - i.e., put loud, vulgar women on the front lines of these protests, with the old chauvinistic idea that the authorities will be more reluctant to disperse, discipline, or jail females? It seems effective. Additionally, it seems that females, who now are predominate in school and hospital administrations are the strongest advocates of transgenderism and it's abhorrent mutilations. (I saw an old Jordan Peterson video where he touched on this subject. He attributed it, at least partially, to a dangerous extension of the mothering instinct.) What is your take on these matters? Please stay well.
On April 24, 2024 at 3:00 pm, Bill Holcomb wrote:
I am the proud possessor of a founding Steyn Club membership, Prisoner of Windsor signed copy, and a climate derangement hockey stick. Keep fighting the good fight!
Do you think the Columbia and Yale riots could have been prevented by distributing more "coexist" bumper stickers a few years back?
On April 24, 2024 at 3:01 pm, William Stroock wrote:
Dear Mark. I'm an American Jew and your Tuesday 'Strolling while Jewish' column on the state of things was right and terrifying. . Even before the war I advised my daughter not to wear a chai or Star of David around NYC. For my part I wear an Israel baseball cap everywhere I go and pro-Israel T-shirts to the gym. I've received nothing but compliments. But our oldest daughter is looking at colleges and the pogroms (let's call them what they are) on college campuses has forced my wife and I to reconsider where we send her. Even local Rutgers, in northern New Jersey, is a hotbed of Juden hass (to use a term the college anti-Jewish protestors will understand). When New York and New Jersey are unsafe for Jews the golden age for Jews in America is over.
On April 24, 2024 at 3:03 pm, Amr Marzouk wrote:
Greetings and salutations from an Australian follower who is now in France so hearing live soon.
Wonder what your take is on the Australian E commissar demanding that the images of an Islamist stabbing a bishop should not be seen by the people of Ecuador, Zambia, Morocco, Nepal etc etc. what are the implications if this control freakness takes hold?
Regards, and stay well.
Amr Australia
On April 24, 2024 at 3:07 pm, James Hanley wrote:
Dear Mr. Steyn,
I am a Founding Member, and although I have listened to most of the Clubland Q&As over the years, I have never submitted a question. But the insane times in which we seem to be living have compelled me to ask a question that I hope you will take seriously.
Although I voted twice for Donald Trump, I do not think he should be the Republican choice for President again. I won't detail the reasons, but just note a couple:
(1) what quality of people would even be willing to work with and for Trump? We need a great many well-qualified cabinet and sub-cabinet members;
(2) these are the times that require a candidate who is self-controlled, relatively honest and intelligent. We dare not elect at this time someone who shoots from the hip as often as President Trump, and makes policy decisions with little or no thoughtful consideration;
(3) despite your suggestions on occasion that Trump deserves revenge for the way he was treated, may I respectfully suggest that the times are too perilous to have a President who is perpetually viewing people and circumstances through his lens of revenge seeking.
With that background painted, this is my question: What can the Republicans do, through Convention maneuvers, or some other tactic, to present a good (not perfect) candidate to the American public?
Sincerely,
Jim Hanley
Founding Club Member
p.s. I know that you think the Republican Party is worthless and want a third party started. But I respectfully suggest that the time is too perilous and too short to do anything but elect a decent Republican candidate who can at least defeat the puppet that now dances to the tune of some unknown puppet masters.
On April 24, 2024 at 3:07 pm, Avida Dollars wrote:
Thank goodness the MAGA knuckleheads of Congress were thwarted in their bid to stop aid to the Ukraine. The Ukraine needs to be in some position of strength when the issue finally reaches the negotiating table.
Concerning the imminent American Presidential election, it is shaping up to be one of the most dismal farces of recent times. Two very flawed frontrunners and not a credible 3rd party candidate in sight. Could the Congressional elections of 2024 bring at least some sane relief? I have no handle as to the quality of the
candidates on offer. It's an important point to ponder. The American government is more that just the Presidency.
On April 24, 2024 at 3:07 pm, steve zukmann not my real name wrote:
Mark
In the event of another stolen election in which the demo"s take congress as well as re-install president nitwit
where do you plan on going?
sincerely,
Steve
On April 24, 2024 at 3:10 pm, William Young wrote:
Hi Mark,
What are your thoughts concerning the possible purchase of The Spectator and the Daily Telegraph by the Abu Dhabi-backed, and former CNN executive Jeff Zucker led, RedBird IMI?
Thanks,
Bill Young
On April 24, 2024 at 3:13 pm, George Pereira wrote:
Mark,
The latest military debacle that resident brandon (spits on the ground in disgust) has masterminded is the us military being run out of Niger. In defeat. in abject surrender. Lions being led by weasels.
It appears that the mostly islamic Niger doesn't appreciate being a critical node in the war against al-Qaida, ISIS and so forth. They are throwing the us military out of their country. They cut power to the $110million base and prevented the delivery of food, water and medicine. They have starved the base out without a shot being fired.
Hum along, everybody knows the tune!
No phone, no lights, no motor car,
not a single luxury
like Robinson Crusoe
it's primitive as can be.
The US is leaving the $110 million dollar base to Niger and their new friends the Russians and Iran.
The US military is leaving another country yet again in defeat, but they are no doubt proudly flying their LGTBblahblahblah flags as they slink away but they are secure in their gender identity and using their pronouns correctly.
Your comments.
On April 24, 2024 at 3:14 pm, OLGA from Arizona wrote:
Greetings Mr. Steyn!
Super excited about the new Serenade show!
We all need more musical diversions to take
the edge off the world falling apart.
Hope your taking on a new project corresponds
with an improvement in health!
Cheers,
OLGA
On April 24, 2024 at 3:15 pm, Norman Fenton wrote:
Mark: Hope you are getting stronger as your OFCOM case is nearing. While Gideon Falter - the guy who was threatened with arrest for being openly Jewish while reporting on one of the pro-Hamas rallies - did well in highlighting the 2-tier policing in London, don't you think it's also pretty hypocritical?
He was a key figure (along with the idiots of the Board of Deputies who actually also despise him for being too openly Jewish in public) whose opposition to Tommy Robinson being present to report on a march against antisemitism led to Tommy's unlawful arrest.
On April 24, 2024 at 3:17 pm, Tim Boggs aka Midwestern Tim wrote:
The last time I was in London was 2006, so all I know about it nowadays is what I see on the news. Seems to me like The Camp of the Saints though. When you go back for your trial will you feel safe? Is it the same ol London you grew up in? If not then what has changed? Is there still time to go there for a fun family vacation?
On April 24, 2024 at 3:17 pm, Elisa Angel wrote:
Do you think the English High Court will focus on principles of freedom of speech and expression when it decides your case, or do you think it will concentrate on the narrower Ofcom regulatory rules to decide? What will Ofcom lawyers be arguing to support Ofcom's censorship?
On April 24, 2024 at 3:18 pm, Alison Castellina wrote:
Danny Kruger MP, who is head and shoulders above most of his colleagues in the dead-as-a-doornail Tory Party, delivered a fine speech to an almost deserted House of Commons last week about the data on excess deaths (the video of his speech is on Dr John Campbell's YT channel under 'Excess Deaths and Data Deficit"). Danny Kruger talked about 'delayed Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Agency (MHRA) information and action on myocarditis and blood clotting'", its issues with conflict of interest, opaqueness in the data and whether the indemnity still holds if the Govt was misled by the manufacturers. He said something which stood out: "This suits no one in high places...". He then proceeded to ask for hard evidence from the Govt on its sources on safety - to prove that there are no links with excess deaths - and for anonymised data showing vaccine status in relation to excess deaths (not least because he himself along with his family is vaccinated).
Do you think that your court case may add any pressure on govt ministers to respond to such requests from MPs (if their data is available and convincing) in an effort to bolster Ofcom's defence?
On April 24, 2024 at 3:20 pm, David Wallington wrote:
Hello, Mark. I wish you great health and luck in your appeal.
At the risk of causing you more stress, would you be able to inform me of how (or if) anyone could come and see you via the public gallery or outside the Court when you take on Ofcom?
Kind regards,
David Wallington.
On April 24, 2024 at 3:21 pm, Pete Procopio wrote:
Mark!
I think mandating the sale of TikTok under the threat of shutting them down as a "national security issue" while simultaneously removing the provision that the new buyer would be forbidden from selling American users data is an old fashion money grab.
These so-called lawmakers aren't concerned with our security, they would just want to pad their portfolios and buy the stock of whatever entity they choose to become the new owners.
What say you?
On April 24, 2024 at 3:22 pm, Josh Passell wrote:
Midweek greetings, Mark, and best wishes for your continued recovery. I hope this comment does your heart good.
The first piece of yours I remember reading was on the slogan "Free Tibet". It dated from 2005, I think, but you took it up again in America Alone the following year:
"It must be great to be the guy with the printing contract for the 'FREE TIBET' stickers. Not so good to be the guy back in Tibet wondering when the freeing thereof will actually get under way."
I was hooked, and very happily still am. So I think you might be interested to know about the address at Harvard's Kennedy School by Chinese Ambassador Xie Feng (not to be confused with femme fatale, Fang Fang). Barely head he begun his remarks when a junior, Cosette Wu, jumped to her feet and held up a banner which read "China Lies". "Xie Feng, you paint an image of a prosperous China, but your hands are painted with blood!" she shouted.
"You've robbed Hong Kongers of their most fundamental freedoms and devastated their democracy. Now in my country Taiwan, you sought to do the same!"
She was strong-armed out of the auditorium by a plain-clothed security man and delivered to a burly uniformed officer. But before Xie could continue painting "an image of a prosperous China", more students were on their feet. What about the Uyghurs, they demanded to know. Another waved the "Snow Lion" flag of the Free Tibet movement.
"Free Tibet!" the man shouted. "How can you be here when the Chinese government is in direct contravention of every human rights law in the world?
"You are a representative of a government that advocates for genocide. The genocide of the Tibetan people, of the Uyghur people, the occupation of Hong Kong.
"You are a travesty. You do not deserve to be here. This is a free country. Shame on you, Xie Feng!"
While I note that the anti-Chi-Com protestors got a lot less airtime than their Anti-Israel classmates, I hope you were as tickled as I was to the Free Tibet sentiment still exists long after the last bumper sticker has faded and peeled. At Harvard, of all places. Even if Ms. Wu notes ruefully:
"Beijing has managed to win over the leadership of world-class universities with funding. It's shocking how many professors kowtow to the Chinese Communist Party and sing its praises." She actually said "kowtow", God bless her. And Tibet is no freer today than 20 years ago.
On April 24, 2024 at 3:23 pm, Joel Dudas wrote:
Greetings and salutations -
I presume you are aware of the dustup that happened last week where folks were bemoaning the fact that WNBA players make much less than their male counterparts in the NBA. But I'd say that a fix is already in the works, and all should calm down. As the trannies increasingly take over the women's league, their play will improve, become more watchable, and salaries will rise. Sure, this means that eventually there will be two men's leagues, but one will have a "W" in it, so everyone should just chill out. Agreed?
Or, if you don't feel like addressing that nutcrackery, maybe you'd prefer to weigh in on a much lighter-hearted question: Which is the more nausea-inducing hypothetical power couple: Liz Cheney and Michael Mann, or AOC and Chuck Schumer?
On April 24, 2024 at 3:23 pm, Toby Pilling wrote:
With the passing of the great MP, Frank Field, might you be able to ponder why todays labour party have totally abandoned the plight of the British working classes?
On April 24, 2024 at 3:24 pm, Wanda Sherratt wrote:
Hi Mark, I'm so happy you've returned with another Tale For Our Time! Of all the stories of dystopian futures you've read, which one do you think most closely resembles our developing dystopian present? Nineteen Eighty-Four? The Marching Morons? The Machine Stops? It used to be said that 'Brave New World' was the way our civilization was going, but on revisiting it recently I think it's too dependent on a boundless supply of cheap energy and technology, and that doesn't seem to be the way to bet anymore.
On April 24, 2024 at 3:29 pm, Bill Dekker wrote:
Dear Mark,
With upcoming elections in the USA, UK, and Canada, there is a detectable sense of hopelessness: that changing the leader, or a few hundred people elected officials won't change anything. In the UK, all candidates seem to be members of the uniparty. Elsewhere, there's the realization that the sheer amount of people directly employed by all levels of government, those contracted to provide government services, rent seekers/ grifters, and those dependant on government handouts now represent a voting majority. It does not seem as if the swamp can ever be drained.
And yet in Argentina, Javier Milei seems to be making headway in cleaning up a decades long mess. Is this for real and if so, how is he doing it? Can it be done elsewhere?
Good luck to you and His Majesty in your joint struggle to restrain OFCOM.
Regards,
Bill
On April 24, 2024 at 3:29 pm, Drew Weber wrote:
Hello Mark,
Thanks for hosting another Clubland Q&A. As each day passes, more evidence mounts that the response to COVID, rather than focused on public and individuals' health, was driven by power grabs and cover-up. As you have well documented, much to the consternation of Ofcom, individuals and society were damaged. However, those responsible have yet to be held to account. Likely they never will.
Despite Trump's less than stellar 2020 campaign versus his knockout in 2016, I believe that absent COVID, he would have triumphed beyond, as you say "the margin of steal". At the risk of floating a hypothetical, if Hillary had won in 2016, would have public health bureaucrats, politicians, and media responded to COVID as they did with Trump in office? Would they have risked her re-election by reporting the daily COVID death ticker, shutting down the economy, closing schools and churches, terminating employees who did not get the jab, etc.? Maybe the same, but I think they would have behaved differently to preserve a presidency rather than destroying it. Your thoughts?
On April 24, 2024 at 3:29 pm, Carolinan wrote:
Our most inquisitorial agency is silent -- the IRS has brought no charges against Trump. Where the hell is our rule of law?
On April 24, 2024 at 3:30 pm, Jamie Marsh wrote:
Alex Berenson came out with an article today suggesting that Trump should refuse to go along with the charade of a show trial that's currently going on in NYC.
While I completely agree, this gets to the heart of concerns I have about Trump. I think he loves the attention so much that he'd rather go along with and complain about the trial, while being the center of attention and drama, than he would stand on principle, call their bluff, and just say I'm not going to have anything to do with this kangaroo court and this blatant show trial.
But if Trump can't or won't stand up against this rinky dink NYC show trial and judge, and all he can do is complain about it, then why in the world should we think he'll do any better against the massively corrupt US deep state and justice system? He failed to do anything about draining the swamp his first time around, so why should we expect a different result, from what would be a second, lame-duck term? I'd be curious to get your thoughts.
On April 24, 2024 at 3:30 pm, annie laurie wrote:
Wow on the SNL skit above. Coincidentally I saw another old SNL video on X yesterday featuring DJT and cast members having fun, acting in a skit with DJT hawking chicken wings. The stark difference between the not so distant past and now is sobering...the "gradually then suddenly" revealing itself.
Looking forward to hearing Q and A-- thank you in advance!
On April 24, 2024 at 3:31 pm, eaglepatriotminuteman1776 wrote:
Dear Mr. Steyn,
I hope us asking the same question twice causes you no inconvenience, and I apologize beforehand if it does, but my wife and I want to hear your critical opinion of On the Beach (1959).
Critics praise the film's anti-war message, but what most touched me most was the dignity of the characters and their commitment to do their duty to the end - from the waiter at the club to Admiral Bidde and his ADC. Also deserving of praise is the film's final minutes, which is, I think, the most powerful ending in cinematic history.
I know that you are fond of film scores. What did you think of the film's version of 'Waltzing Matilda'? I never thought such a happy song could be used as the soundtrack to the apocalypse. Also, we would love to hear your thoughts on Fred Astaire's performance.
When the end of the world comes, Mark, I'll floor the gas of my Toyota Corolla in my cabin on the last day of the Mark Steyn Cruise. Too poor for a Ferrari.
Yours Faithfully,
William Fleishman
On April 24, 2024 at 3:32 pm, Bideford Jake wrote:
Dear Mark,
I have a put-upon friend who is really under the thumb of his family. This last Bank Holiday found him putting up a fence for his aged mum and when I asked why wasn't he at home playing with his kiddie he ruefully replied "She's at the beach with her mum - which is where I should be." "Then put your ruddy foot down!" I blurted out without thinking and he hung up. It was none of my business, of course.
Peculiarly, I was reminded of a line about a lovelorn armadillo up on Salisbury Plain singing a longing lament to an abandoned rusting tank. Michael Flanders sang:
Should I tell him, gaunt and rusting, with the willow tree above,
This - abandoned on manoeuvres - is the object of your love?
I left him to his singing,
Cycled home without a pause,
Never tell a man the truth
About the one that he adores
Over the years this little song, with its gorgeous piano flourish, has given me more delight than I can say. I consider it high art. During these dark and disturbing times I find I turn to the charming innocence of such pieces to help me through the night. Comic songs may be the poor cousin of the American standard but I suspect they are the highest form of the songwriting craft and the most difficult to pull off. Very, very few songwriters have even attempted the feat.
Mark, given your musical background, dazzlingly wit and effortless ability to "turn a phrase till it catches the light," have you ever put words to music or collaborated on a comic song? Having published books and articles that will be read after you are gone is a great achievement but wouldn't you love the thought of having your song sung in the evermore?
I rarely read Clive James now but one of his Pete Atkin lyrics - Payday Evening, Thirty Year Man or Beware of the Beautiful Stranger - usually pops up on the iTunes shuffle each week. A popular song means you really will live forever.
Thank you for standing up for us all, Mark.
Best wishes,
Bideford Jake
On April 24, 2024 at 3:34 pm, Rachel Aranoff wrote:
This issue of campus encampments is more complex than it appears in the media. My daughter is a proud, Jewish, Israel-supporting, conservative student at Columbia University and has safely strolled through the encampment and campus multiple times filming and having conversations with the pro Palestinian protesters, many of whom are Jews and are her friends. This group is quite distinct from the Antifa thugs who say vile things and are violent outside the gates of campus.
When rabbis of leading synagogues in nyc and many others (perhaps even assistant professor Shai Davidai) stood at rallies over this past year where they smeared the prime minister of Israel as a fascist who is trying to destroy democracy (even when many ppl like me explained that this is dangerous and an extreme exaggeration and they are playing into the narrative of those who hate us) and then a few months after October 7th returned to posting on social media their hate for the PM of Israel, that 10/7 is his fault, that he is delaying a hostage agreement/ceasefire in order to stay in power, that Jewish settlers are terrorists who must be sanctioned - they should not be shocked when their party moves slightly to the left and suddenly the party sets its angry eyes upon them. Tragically, this will eventually happen to the thousands of Jews who are in these encampments and those having a protest Seder outside Schumer's house too. These protesters have taken Jewish smears of Israel seriously. They demand the U.S. not support a country that keeps voting in a "fascist" for PM and has settlers who run around "terrorizing innocent Palestinians". They don't understand that the left see every Jew in Israel as a settler. "From the River to the Sea, Palestine will be free."
I 100% agree that it is anti semitism that is keeping Shai Davidai off campus and it is disgusting how he is being treated and I will rally and fight for him to be treated as well as the pro Palestinians on campus. That said, I don't see him as a leader and I cannot stand behind him. I can stand in front of him and protect him from his former friends.
On April 24, 2024 at 3:34 pm, Michelle Dulak wrote:
Hi Mark,
Hope you are keeping well(ish)!
I went to UC/Berkeley in the 80s, and there were plenty of protests then, too -- over the likes of disinvestment from South Africa, the fate of People's Park, and the destination of that one redwood that Julia "Butterfly" Hill climbed up and refused to come down from. But I've never seen anything remotely like this. Possibly because South Africans were very rare on campus, but Jews were and are not, and for all of the painstaking disaggregation of "Jews" from "Zionists," in practice they are the same.
I can't see much of a way out of this, so long as Israel exists at all. These protesters won't stop until they reach that goal -- and beyond, if calls for a "global intifada" are to be believed.
On April 24, 2024 at 3:35 pm, ARayJr wrote:
Mark, today (Apr 24/Breitbart News UK, by Kurt Zindulka) it was reported in the news that UK Psychologists have 'apologised' for promoting transgender "medicine" to children citing "multi-factorial systemic failure" by the British Psychological Society at the Orwellian giddy Gender Identity Development Service(GIDS). Grooming indecent depraved sexualization of children was what they were really doing. Another set back for the Corporate and Governmental Trans Industrial Complex.
Perhaps now that "trans-science" and "trans-medicine" MIGHT have to change back to actual science and medicine (unlike changing back the boys and girls to actual boys and girls after being drugged, blocked, "-ectomied", harmed and disfigured by this Mengele-like "sexualized scientific" experimentation) will the "Covid-Science/ Fauci fraudsters" admit their "multi-factorial systemic failure", "blizzard of lies" and jackbooted socialized medicine stormtroopers in OfCom is one gargantuan lie and mistake?
On April 24, 2024 at 3:36 pm, Kenneth wrote:
I haven't heard anything about the proposed Irish hate speech law of late. Is that still going forward, or has it been shelved in wake of the recent votes on the constitutional amendments?
On April 24, 2024 at 3:36 pm, Matt from Upstate NY wrote:
Dear Mark,
I was disappointed to read that Japan has slowly been opening the floodgates to mass immigration in recent years, with over 2 million foreign workers and predictably many calls for more, including efforts to recruit high tech workers from India. I guess Japan may not end as Japanese after all. Any predictions for Japan and what immigration will do to them if they continue on that path?
On April 24, 2024 at 3:44 pm, Johnny B wrote:
Hi Mark. I was enjoying listening to 'Trial by Jury' last night especially the Usher's solo 'Now Jurymen, hear my advice, All kinds of vulgar prejudice, I pray you set aside. With stern judicial frame of mind, From bias free of every kind, This trial must be tried.' After this exhortation the Usher proceeds to lambast the defendant and totally sympathise with the pretty plaintiff. I wonder what your expectations are for the justice system in London compared to your recent unhappy but not unexpected experience in DC. I always assume that British justice is, for the moment at least, less politically biased than the US variety. By the way, how many days is the London case expected to run for? Best wishes , John
On April 24, 2024 at 4:01 pm, Michelle Dulak wrote:
Dear Mark,
Re: "Coexist": You've missed the best part. Just after 10/7, there was a new edition of "Coexist," with a Hamas paraglider in place of the Star of David.
On April 24, 2024 at 4:01 pm, OLGA from Arizona wrote:
Since it's Passover & we're celebrating
freedom from slavery, I am not inclined
to doom-&-gloomy Jewy commentary.
"In every generation, they rise up to
destroy us, & the Holy One, blessed
be He, delivers us from their hands."
The Jews are doing a bang-up job
cleaning the vermin from Gaza, &
there is a resurgence in Jewish
devotion in both Israel & America.
Am Israel Chai
On April 24, 2024 at 4:08 pm, Harold Emmons Jr. wrote:
As an 84 year old club member with a father who had an 8th grade education you were right on target today with your entire program. Thanks Mark. Stay well.
On April 24, 2024 at 4:12 pm, Elizabeth Janairo wrote:
Your choice of anti Trump questions is disgusting!
On April 24, 2024 at 4:19 pm, Mike Cliffson wrote:
Dear Mark,
On education UK I expect USA, plenty other places, I cannot improve on what my antipodean mother opined half a century ago:" there's nothing for it but to scrap the whole lot and start over 'and things have only got worse since then. End the indoctrination. Let alone that the system in UK produces one child in six who leaves education both illiterate and incompetent in simple arithmetic. Many of the other five are not much better off.
I happen to agree with you that that it is the very first few years that are utterly crucial and you can put it better than I can. I am much taken by Dorothy Sayers advocacy of the old Roman system slightly adapted which she called the lost tools of learning but in any case had kids ready for university by 13 to 14. I was very lucky to get a superb teacher when aged eight to whom I know the basis of everything I now know." You can't just sack everybody. Think of all the poor cleaners. They are thinking of all the poor bureaucrats. I think you're right lower the tone or go under.
On April 24, 2024 at 4:19 pm, Suzanne Reny wrote:
Further to Hart's comment. Yes, they put the c u next Tuesdays for Islam at the front to be the first to be attacked while the men hide behind them for safety. That's the way Hamasniks roll.
If this comment doesn't make the cut I understand, it was meant to be rude to the demonstrating fools because the time for niceties is long gone.
On April 24, 2024 at 4:34 pm, OLGA from Arizona wrote:
Miss Michelle,
I promise to give you proper attribution whenever I cite that
bitingly accurate observation.
